Oelm, In parts 1 and 2 “you write” a lot about the “Russian Vedas”, about the “Slavic-Aryan Vedas”.
This speaks to your (or the authors you are quoting) complete lack of competence on this matter.
I didn't write anything, as this is your style of copy-pasting other people's thoughts, substituting them for your own. The entire post was taken from a Slavic-pagan portal, the author is the Russian philosopher Stanislav Sviridov, writing about the sect of the Ynglists, to which you apparently need to be assigned, so that you don't babble one thing today and another tomorrow. That's clearer. Secondly, the Slavic-Aryan Vedas, supposedly written in runes, are exactly what you have tried more than once to present as the ultimate truth. The work shows exactly how to understand that this is a fake created by followers of A. Khinevich - pastor Diy.
……
It turns out that the Slavs and Hindus could well have had a common ancestor, with that very “basic” haplotype, 16-12-25-11-11-13.
Again, it's clear that you haven't read anything from my link; it states in plain text exactly what you are presenting as a discovery.
The identification of Slavs and Aryans began with the interpretation of the proto-urban complex Arkaim (naturally, in a non-scientific environment), publications by Asov and Belov. I dare to assume that they developed the hypothesis of Demin-Zharnikova-Guseva. The influence of Indian culture on Russian is present, this is evident from the language and the names of some Gods. But the thing is that Ynglism asserts that the Rus influenced the culture of India. Khinevich knew all this when he developed the ideology and created his “Slavic-Aryan Vedas,” which satisfied everyone to the maximum. Partly because, at the beginning of his spiritual path, Khinevich tried to create a religion that unites all known religious teachings. Naturally, there are no archaeological or anthropological data that would allow the identification of these two completely different ethnic groups. One could talk about this issue for a long time, but Khinevich divided the Russians into 4 types. The difference is only in eye color and type of activity, and he introduced his own mythological horror story of enemies, replacing them with the epithet “gray.” All this resembles the eugenics of the 30s of the 20th century, or, if you will, an attempt, colored in eugenic tones, to create a caste society on the model of the Indian one. In the interpretation of the Ynglings, this is nothing but blatant fascism, having nothing to do with Rodnovery! For which, as a result, he received several criminal cases:
To speak about a Slavic-Aryan culture in the full sense of the word is simply unimaginably stupid!(this sounds too categorical) There is a Slavic linguistic community, with specific, related ethnic groups: Russians, Belarusians, Ukrainians… The Aryans have never been part of this linguistic community. And indications of the kinship of Sanskrit with the Russian language are not all-encompassing. There are more coincidences of the Proto-Russian language in Baltic linguistic roots… And Demin's study of toponymy and hydronymy only testifies that the migration routes of the pastoralist-farmers – the Aryans – passed through the northern lands of our homeland. Possibly, these tribes also passed through the Ural mountains. To identify ourselves with the Aryans solely because of this is the same as identifying ourselves with the Tatar-Mongols… Although some continuity of cultures could have remained, and it is these points of assimilation that are interesting. Everything else is an erroneous interpretation of facts in favor of the nationalist and chauvinistic ravings of Khinevich. The Sanskritologist Professor Guseva also came to this position when she realized what ground for interpretations she had created (Guseva N. R. Arctic Cradle? // Rodina. – 1997. – No. 8. – pp. 81-83; She. Russians Through the Millennia: Arctic Theory. – M., 1998; She. Arctic Homeland in the Vedas // Who Are They and Where From? The Oldest Connections of Slavs and Aryans / N. R. Guseva (ed.); Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology RAS. – M., 1998.)
Oh, the catechism...
Debunking the "Catechism" is a Sisyphean task, for human wisdom has its limits, while stupidity is limitless. I have a rough draft for an article, raw, just a note on the cuff, but it might "highlight" the article. This is the Judeophobe test:
1. What should a hyper-conscious Ukrainian do when a Moskal (Pole, Magyar, Gypsy, etc.) insults a Ukrainian Jew for speaking Ukrainian: kill the Jew; kill the Moskal; kill himself; first kill the Moskal, then the Jew?
2. Must a hyper-conscious Ukrainian die rather than be treated by a Jewish doctor?
3. Can a hyper-conscious Ukrainian accept internal organs for transplant or blood for transfusion if the donor is a Jew?
4. Must a hyper-conscious Ukrainian bleed himself to death from shame if it turns out his grandfather received a transfusion from a Jewish donor?
5. Can the children of a hyper-conscious Ukrainian study with a Jewish teacher if that teacher teaches Ukrainian language and literature?
6. Must a hyper-conscious Ukrainian demand to leave an airplane if it turns out mid-flight that the plane is piloted by a Jew?
7. Can a hyper-conscious Ukrainian demand that a product label indicate that there was not a single Jew among the manufacturers, and what to do if such information for a product from China is provided in Chinese?
8. Must a hyper-conscious Ukrainian convert to Judaism before death so that there will be one less Jew after death?
Все в ней нулево и кукольно.