Forum

Ariputra, to understand something, you need to understand that something. Your position is simply banal; you personally don't have any opinion other than the obsessive idea of denying everything. By denying and ridiculing the opinions of some scientists, you present the opinions of other, and not-so-scientific, individuals as absolute truth as counterarguments. In other words, those whose position you dislike are mere charlatans, while those who contradict them are geniuses. But the most talentless aspect of your posts is when you run out of material from the search engine, and you simply invoke God, as if He created everything, and you don't seem to realize that the God you speak of is much younger than human life on Earth in general. Before Him, people had other gods, and before those, even more ancient gods, and there wasn't just one or two, but one for every occasion. But dinosaurs, whose existence on Earth you hopefully won't deny, didn't have a god, because their modest brains were not capable of conceiving of one, and they didn't need it. I repeat once again: believing in God is everyone's right, but everything has reasonable limits. I won't hide the fact that I myself have turned to God in difficult moments, saying "Lord, help me," but this is something like when a small child cries "Mom," it's faith and hope, it's inside each of us, and it's good that it exists, it's good that we invented it, it's good that we need it, and you are a pervert