Oelm
Auto-translated
Part Two..
Stanislav Sviridov
To speak of Slavic-Aryan culture in the full sense of the word is simply unimaginably foolish! There is a Slavic linguistic community with specific, related ethnicities: Russians, Belarusians, Ukrainians… Aryans were never part of this linguistic community. And indications of the kinship between Sanskrit and the Russian language are not comprehensive. There are more coincidences of the proto-Russian language in Baltic linguistic roots… And the study of toponymy and hydronymy by Demin only proves that the migration routes of the Aryan cattle-breeders and plowmen passed through the northern lands of our homeland. Perhaps these tribes also passed through the Ural Mountains. To identify us with Aryans solely because of this is the same as identifying us with own Tatar-Mongols… Although some cultural continuity may have remained, and these points of assimilation are what's interesting. Everything else is a erroneous interpretation of facts to suit the nationalistic and chauvinistic delusions of Khinevich. The Sanskritologist Professor Guseva reached such a position when she realized what ground for interpretations she had created (Guseva N. R. Arctic Cradle? // Rodina. – 1997. – No. 8. – pp. 81-83; She same. Russians through the millennia: Arctic theory. – M., 1998; She same. Arctic homeland in the Vedas // Who are they and where from? Ancient links between Slavs and Aryans / N. R. Guseva (ed.); Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology RAS. – M., 1998.)
Asov's Open Letter to the Inglingi
Funny enough, Barashkov wrote to the Inglingi ("Instructions for creating a 'filthy' sect using the Internet"). There is no need to provide the text of his letter, but we will name the main theses. Asov declared the ideas of Akhinevich (this word formation was first introduced by Asov. Italics mine S.A.) as nothing other than low-grade plagiarism. Although the tone of the open letter is somewhat cynical, it is not devoid of references to primary sources, so at least in this matter Asov's hands are clean. For those interested, the text can be found here: http://educatorsoft.com/alexandracov/default.aspx?PageID=77
Barashkov accuses Akhinevich of gross plagiarism of his own works, Belov's works, and a number of works by Professor M.I. Steblin-Kamensky and O. A. Smirnitskaya were also affected. True, Asov cannot help but criticize publishing houses, Rodnovers, and exalt his own works, particularly on decipherment, although it is no secret to anyone that he cannot provide primary sources for his own work. The difference between Asov and Khinevich is that Asov at least reads a little and refers to academic literature. Although his works are not recognized by official science…
Ingliism and Ultra-Right Nationalism
All criminal cases regarding Ingliism have a nationalistic tinge. This is caused by a number of factors. In his lectures, Khinevich fiercely pits against and humiliates all religions except the faith of the ancestors. He exalts the Slavic-Aryan past in his mythological schemes and clearly opposes ethnicities, with Slavs in the leading position. Most offensive of all is that this fictional semiotic structure is currently the most popular and sought-after among Rodnovery! All "Valkyries," "Heavenly Boars," and other solar symbols were invented by Khinevich. Hardly 3-4 symbols out of all the solar ones have archaeological and ethnographic confirmation; barely 1-2 symbols bear the name that has become attached to them in ethnography. But Khinevich positions his symbols as a great heritage. And allegedly there are 144 of them. Undoubtedly and unconditionally, science has proven that Slavs possessed a solar symbol in various forms, but we consider it blasphemous to invent variations and names for symbols!!! This humiliates our cultural memory, discredits today's endeavors, and frankly reeks of mercenary goals (the sale of souvenirs with these symbols is very widespread). All symbols are filled with high spirituality and meaning. But I do not think the authors of this work know the difference between a symbol and a sign, and naturally, they have not engaged in archaeology to find confirmation for anything! This swastika diversity became the basis for many political nationalistic parties and societies; these theories were adopted by other leaders of Slavic-Aryan ideology (Trekhlebov, Levashov). All this simply discredited the topic of Slavic paganism in a crude manner. Khinevich does not even realize that fertility symbols played the most important role in the daily life of Slavs, or that the Sun can be interpreted as emerging, fertile, etc., based only on its seasonal activity. The raising of the hand at holidays is very offensive to Slavs, and generally, this gesture is not characteristic of Slavs (more details here http://slaviy.ru/yazycheskoe-mirovozzrenie/kak-zdorovalis-predki-slavyan/)), but this does not stop him from promoting this symbol.
There is a confession from a person once close to Khinevich, who now openly says that the symbols—for example, the today-popular "Valkyrie" symbol—were developed in Photoshop. This is not surprising; at the beginning of the article, we said that Ingliism is a sect with a Scandinavian-Indian-Slavic bias. That is why the Valkyrie is present in the symbols. And some symbols resemble those of the RNE. Simply put, as we will tell you shortly below about the glorious history of the Omsk sect, Khinevich collaborated closely with the RNE and then created his own spiritual school. Yes, and let's not forget Midgard and its connections to Slavs, which naturally do not exist, but Ingliism says otherwise…
Pantheon of Gods
A. Khinevich
Reveals the essence of Ingliism as a sect based on the Indian Vedas, allowing for a pantheon of Slavic gods. This includes Ra-m-kha, Ingl, Vyshen, Kryshen, Tara…
All this is passed off as genuine and as Slavic-Aryan Gods! This is simply outrageous, blasphemous. Often entering into disputes with adepts of the Ingliism sect, we ask them to provide even one source where such Gods are mentioned. To this, I received the answer "that you need to believe and then everything will become clear." To all those who continue to believe in these gods, we ask the same question: "in which sources are there mentions of these Gods?". But that's not all; in the Ingliism pantheon, the God Pater Diy appears, and the photograph looks too much like A. Khinevich. For what purposes this was done is, we think, obvious.
The Personality of Khinevich
From his biography, we know that he received a mediocre education, traveled through Europe, was a mediocre bard, engaged in esotericism and healing, even created the "Zhiva" temple, and was a DJ—only then did he create the sect known to us. Here is the full description of the sect and Khinevich's wanderings from one teaching to another:
http://ukrsekta.info/2008/11/03/dzhivakhram_inglii.html
Here is his poster from the pre-Ingliist period.
Khinevich smokes, drinks, according to eyewitness accounts, harasses young girls, and is extremely cynical. Here, for example, is a video where he smokes
http://rutube.ru/tracks/3044069.html?v=8ca207e836524d324387d613650b333a
Here are the memories of an eyewitness: "A. Khinevich gives only very rare and meager lessons to just one 3rd-year group consisting of 5-6 people. The 2nd and former 1st-year students, having studied via cassettes, pack their things and leave for their home regions. Deceived people, striving to obtain knowledge, came for training as entire families, leaving their own homes and selling apartments and belongings. But upon arrival, they encountered the real, not the staged A. Khinevich: he showed interest in students only until their modest savings ran out (his interest in young and trusting girls lasted a bit longer, sometimes 'unhealthy', to put it mildly); further, he became either excessively rude to the newcomers or ignored them, playing computer poker while they waited for an answer about their further fate, pretending not to notice those who approached him. Those who had any self-respect left. Only those remained who either had no money (they can be counted on one hand) or those who found themselves by fawning over a false priest worthy of them, selling trinkets to newcomers and stripping them bare."
Many suspected Khinevich of hidden Semitism. It is not for us to judge. And this topic does not interest us. For those who wish to read material on this subject, read here: http://via-midgard.info/razoblacheniya/12209-koe-chto-o-nacionalnosti-patera-diya-xinevicha.html
But for the especially non-believing, we provide a video by A. Budnikov:
http://www.teknikdestek.tv/–izle-1sWto6usqLXV1rc.html
Although Budnikov confirms the words of eyewitnesses, he does not criticize the teaching itself, as Ingliism lies at the basis of his own. Later we will analyze other examples of why this happens.
We could finish now, but what about Trekhlebov, Levashov, Darislav, Kurovsky, Globa…?
Currently, A. Khinevich is not very popular among Rodnovers and slightly more popular in the so-called Old Believer community. Yes, he is less popular than Trekhlebov. Trekhlebov is now the spiritual teacher of the Slavic-Aryans. He develops the ufological component of Ingliism more deeply. And unlike A. Khinevich, he promotes vegetarianism. His book "Koshuny Finista" is a mixture of antisemitism, Krishnaism, and linguofrikery, which he learned from Grinevich. There are barely 10 pages about Slavs there. But nevertheless, this man, having adopted Khinevich's ideology, now carries ufology and same-style Krishnaism to the masses in a Slavic manner. He says that his mother is from Sirius, that one must bury weapons and prepare for an invasion of lizards. Inglingi even began to speculate when they will arrive, on what they will arrive, and what armament the invaders will have. It should be said that Trekhlebov gets along with Khinevich. The same cannot be said about the alleged academician Levashov (more about his falsifications can be read here: http://www.slovensk.su/msevm/). This "prophet" also bases himself on the ideology of Ingliism, but already with a lean toward the pseudo-scientific environment. Above we gave a link where there are many critical articles examining his activity. And how can an academician end up on the list of extremist materials http://www.minjust.ru/ru/activity/nko/fedspisok/ (Number 809)? And with Levashov entering the game, a struggle for Ingliism followers begins. But since Trekhlebov and Khinevich most likely came to an agreement, Levashov joined the trough without their permission.
Levashov
But many suspect him of conspiracy with Lawrence Rockefeller. In any case, we see the following: http://rutube.ru/tracks/3861364.html?v=713c142e279619138a8b5176f7a43b1e
In this video, Trekhlebov exposes Levashov. To which he responds:
http://rutube.ru/tracks/3844707.html?v=9878c5b3663678e20bad2d71bfe3c146
But all this is not liked by General Petrov, as some followers of KOB also fell into Ingliism. And we get an exposure from him:
http://rutube.ru/tracks/3114251.html?v=4e28f1ccddc0bca55a438e4e95015bbc
But after his death, Petrov's former comrade, Zaznobin, exposes Rodnovery in general: http://rutube.ru/tracks/2569410.html?v=c0dc6e8ad1d8912e761d9ef27d4d31d4
Only the KOB-ers criticize the ideology to some extent; others don't even touch it, simply attacking personalities. No one cuts the branch they are sitting on; everyone just throws mud at opponents. Although from our article it is clear how Ingliism was built, what it is based on, etc.
We could also mention Globa, the editor of "Vedic Culture," which, like Levashov's work, is included in the list of extremist materials under numbers 595-96. He acted as a fervent follower of Khinevich even before Trekhlebov and Levashov appeared on the scene, but disappeared after court cases regarding his journal.
Ukrainians suffer from Kurovsky, who adopted Ingliism and implemented it in his homeland.
Darislav continues to carry Ingliism to the masses in its pure form. Can all of them even be mentioned?
One could also analyze the activities of all these Inglingi and consider the specifics. Only a very reasonable question: why? Is it not obvious that a redistribution of power is happening in this sect? Is it not clear that Rodnovers are being stupefied? At the end of this section, I would like to quote the statement of Rodnover communities on the topic of pseudo-paganism:
http://yggeld.livejournal.com/49791.html
Conclusions
Self-respecting Rodnovers have long since begun a struggle against Ingliism as a natural disaster, as a provocation, and as any sect. One often hears the argument of the Inglingi that Rodnovers and they have nothing to divide—the Slavic faith is one and its essence is one! They try to find a compromise that cannot exist, because Ingliism substituted many concepts and eventually turned everything upside down. Ingliism is the main destructive element; it is by this that any Rodnover is characterized, and washing off this filth is very, very difficult, if possible at all. Ingliism is not Slavic paganism (they do not use this word at all; for them it means foreigners and non-believers). According to Vadim Kazakov's concise designation, Ingliists are "White-paranoid and rakomoltsy." According to Rodnovers, wherever the Inglingi appear, everything collapses: people eventually quarrel, industrial artels and communities break up. What was intended by Khinevich to unite Slavs actually defiled and divided them. And from the last quotes, I would like to bring the words of one Rodnover: "Looking for rational grains in Ingliism is like looking for gold in a chamber pot."
Added after 3 minutes
Frequently asked questions about Ingliism (i.e., the fetish of the ariputra)
http://slaviy.ru/faq-po-ingliizmu/
Stanislav Sviridov
To speak of Slavic-Aryan culture in the full sense of the word is simply unimaginably foolish! There is a Slavic linguistic community with specific, related ethnicities: Russians, Belarusians, Ukrainians… Aryans were never part of this linguistic community. And indications of the kinship between Sanskrit and the Russian language are not comprehensive. There are more coincidences of the proto-Russian language in Baltic linguistic roots… And the study of toponymy and hydronymy by Demin only proves that the migration routes of the Aryan cattle-breeders and plowmen passed through the northern lands of our homeland. Perhaps these tribes also passed through the Ural Mountains. To identify us with Aryans solely because of this is the same as identifying us with own Tatar-Mongols… Although some cultural continuity may have remained, and these points of assimilation are what's interesting. Everything else is a erroneous interpretation of facts to suit the nationalistic and chauvinistic delusions of Khinevich. The Sanskritologist Professor Guseva reached such a position when she realized what ground for interpretations she had created (Guseva N. R. Arctic Cradle? // Rodina. – 1997. – No. 8. – pp. 81-83; She same. Russians through the millennia: Arctic theory. – M., 1998; She same. Arctic homeland in the Vedas // Who are they and where from? Ancient links between Slavs and Aryans / N. R. Guseva (ed.); Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology RAS. – M., 1998.)
Asov's Open Letter to the Inglingi
Funny enough, Barashkov wrote to the Inglingi ("Instructions for creating a 'filthy' sect using the Internet"). There is no need to provide the text of his letter, but we will name the main theses. Asov declared the ideas of Akhinevich (this word formation was first introduced by Asov. Italics mine S.A.) as nothing other than low-grade plagiarism. Although the tone of the open letter is somewhat cynical, it is not devoid of references to primary sources, so at least in this matter Asov's hands are clean. For those interested, the text can be found here: http://educatorsoft.com/alexandracov/default.aspx?PageID=77
Barashkov accuses Akhinevich of gross plagiarism of his own works, Belov's works, and a number of works by Professor M.I. Steblin-Kamensky and O. A. Smirnitskaya were also affected. True, Asov cannot help but criticize publishing houses, Rodnovers, and exalt his own works, particularly on decipherment, although it is no secret to anyone that he cannot provide primary sources for his own work. The difference between Asov and Khinevich is that Asov at least reads a little and refers to academic literature. Although his works are not recognized by official science…
Ingliism and Ultra-Right Nationalism
All criminal cases regarding Ingliism have a nationalistic tinge. This is caused by a number of factors. In his lectures, Khinevich fiercely pits against and humiliates all religions except the faith of the ancestors. He exalts the Slavic-Aryan past in his mythological schemes and clearly opposes ethnicities, with Slavs in the leading position. Most offensive of all is that this fictional semiotic structure is currently the most popular and sought-after among Rodnovery! All "Valkyries," "Heavenly Boars," and other solar symbols were invented by Khinevich. Hardly 3-4 symbols out of all the solar ones have archaeological and ethnographic confirmation; barely 1-2 symbols bear the name that has become attached to them in ethnography. But Khinevich positions his symbols as a great heritage. And allegedly there are 144 of them. Undoubtedly and unconditionally, science has proven that Slavs possessed a solar symbol in various forms, but we consider it blasphemous to invent variations and names for symbols!!! This humiliates our cultural memory, discredits today's endeavors, and frankly reeks of mercenary goals (the sale of souvenirs with these symbols is very widespread). All symbols are filled with high spirituality and meaning. But I do not think the authors of this work know the difference between a symbol and a sign, and naturally, they have not engaged in archaeology to find confirmation for anything! This swastika diversity became the basis for many political nationalistic parties and societies; these theories were adopted by other leaders of Slavic-Aryan ideology (Trekhlebov, Levashov). All this simply discredited the topic of Slavic paganism in a crude manner. Khinevich does not even realize that fertility symbols played the most important role in the daily life of Slavs, or that the Sun can be interpreted as emerging, fertile, etc., based only on its seasonal activity. The raising of the hand at holidays is very offensive to Slavs, and generally, this gesture is not characteristic of Slavs (more details here http://slaviy.ru/yazycheskoe-mirovozzrenie/kak-zdorovalis-predki-slavyan/)), but this does not stop him from promoting this symbol.
There is a confession from a person once close to Khinevich, who now openly says that the symbols—for example, the today-popular "Valkyrie" symbol—were developed in Photoshop. This is not surprising; at the beginning of the article, we said that Ingliism is a sect with a Scandinavian-Indian-Slavic bias. That is why the Valkyrie is present in the symbols. And some symbols resemble those of the RNE. Simply put, as we will tell you shortly below about the glorious history of the Omsk sect, Khinevich collaborated closely with the RNE and then created his own spiritual school. Yes, and let's not forget Midgard and its connections to Slavs, which naturally do not exist, but Ingliism says otherwise…
Pantheon of Gods
A. Khinevich
Reveals the essence of Ingliism as a sect based on the Indian Vedas, allowing for a pantheon of Slavic gods. This includes Ra-m-kha, Ingl, Vyshen, Kryshen, Tara…
All this is passed off as genuine and as Slavic-Aryan Gods! This is simply outrageous, blasphemous. Often entering into disputes with adepts of the Ingliism sect, we ask them to provide even one source where such Gods are mentioned. To this, I received the answer "that you need to believe and then everything will become clear." To all those who continue to believe in these gods, we ask the same question: "in which sources are there mentions of these Gods?". But that's not all; in the Ingliism pantheon, the God Pater Diy appears, and the photograph looks too much like A. Khinevich. For what purposes this was done is, we think, obvious.
The Personality of Khinevich
From his biography, we know that he received a mediocre education, traveled through Europe, was a mediocre bard, engaged in esotericism and healing, even created the "Zhiva" temple, and was a DJ—only then did he create the sect known to us. Here is the full description of the sect and Khinevich's wanderings from one teaching to another:
http://ukrsekta.info/2008/11/03/dzhivakhram_inglii.html
Here is his poster from the pre-Ingliist period.
Khinevich smokes, drinks, according to eyewitness accounts, harasses young girls, and is extremely cynical. Here, for example, is a video where he smokes
http://rutube.ru/tracks/3044069.html?v=8ca207e836524d324387d613650b333a
Here are the memories of an eyewitness: "A. Khinevich gives only very rare and meager lessons to just one 3rd-year group consisting of 5-6 people. The 2nd and former 1st-year students, having studied via cassettes, pack their things and leave for their home regions. Deceived people, striving to obtain knowledge, came for training as entire families, leaving their own homes and selling apartments and belongings. But upon arrival, they encountered the real, not the staged A. Khinevich: he showed interest in students only until their modest savings ran out (his interest in young and trusting girls lasted a bit longer, sometimes 'unhealthy', to put it mildly); further, he became either excessively rude to the newcomers or ignored them, playing computer poker while they waited for an answer about their further fate, pretending not to notice those who approached him. Those who had any self-respect left. Only those remained who either had no money (they can be counted on one hand) or those who found themselves by fawning over a false priest worthy of them, selling trinkets to newcomers and stripping them bare."
Many suspected Khinevich of hidden Semitism. It is not for us to judge. And this topic does not interest us. For those who wish to read material on this subject, read here: http://via-midgard.info/razoblacheniya/12209-koe-chto-o-nacionalnosti-patera-diya-xinevicha.html
But for the especially non-believing, we provide a video by A. Budnikov:
http://www.teknikdestek.tv/–izle-1sWto6usqLXV1rc.html
Although Budnikov confirms the words of eyewitnesses, he does not criticize the teaching itself, as Ingliism lies at the basis of his own. Later we will analyze other examples of why this happens.
We could finish now, but what about Trekhlebov, Levashov, Darislav, Kurovsky, Globa…?
Currently, A. Khinevich is not very popular among Rodnovers and slightly more popular in the so-called Old Believer community. Yes, he is less popular than Trekhlebov. Trekhlebov is now the spiritual teacher of the Slavic-Aryans. He develops the ufological component of Ingliism more deeply. And unlike A. Khinevich, he promotes vegetarianism. His book "Koshuny Finista" is a mixture of antisemitism, Krishnaism, and linguofrikery, which he learned from Grinevich. There are barely 10 pages about Slavs there. But nevertheless, this man, having adopted Khinevich's ideology, now carries ufology and same-style Krishnaism to the masses in a Slavic manner. He says that his mother is from Sirius, that one must bury weapons and prepare for an invasion of lizards. Inglingi even began to speculate when they will arrive, on what they will arrive, and what armament the invaders will have. It should be said that Trekhlebov gets along with Khinevich. The same cannot be said about the alleged academician Levashov (more about his falsifications can be read here: http://www.slovensk.su/msevm/). This "prophet" also bases himself on the ideology of Ingliism, but already with a lean toward the pseudo-scientific environment. Above we gave a link where there are many critical articles examining his activity. And how can an academician end up on the list of extremist materials http://www.minjust.ru/ru/activity/nko/fedspisok/ (Number 809)? And with Levashov entering the game, a struggle for Ingliism followers begins. But since Trekhlebov and Khinevich most likely came to an agreement, Levashov joined the trough without their permission.
Levashov
But many suspect him of conspiracy with Lawrence Rockefeller. In any case, we see the following: http://rutube.ru/tracks/3861364.html?v=713c142e279619138a8b5176f7a43b1e
In this video, Trekhlebov exposes Levashov. To which he responds:
http://rutube.ru/tracks/3844707.html?v=9878c5b3663678e20bad2d71bfe3c146
But all this is not liked by General Petrov, as some followers of KOB also fell into Ingliism. And we get an exposure from him:
http://rutube.ru/tracks/3114251.html?v=4e28f1ccddc0bca55a438e4e95015bbc
But after his death, Petrov's former comrade, Zaznobin, exposes Rodnovery in general: http://rutube.ru/tracks/2569410.html?v=c0dc6e8ad1d8912e761d9ef27d4d31d4
Only the KOB-ers criticize the ideology to some extent; others don't even touch it, simply attacking personalities. No one cuts the branch they are sitting on; everyone just throws mud at opponents. Although from our article it is clear how Ingliism was built, what it is based on, etc.
We could also mention Globa, the editor of "Vedic Culture," which, like Levashov's work, is included in the list of extremist materials under numbers 595-96. He acted as a fervent follower of Khinevich even before Trekhlebov and Levashov appeared on the scene, but disappeared after court cases regarding his journal.
Ukrainians suffer from Kurovsky, who adopted Ingliism and implemented it in his homeland.
Darislav continues to carry Ingliism to the masses in its pure form. Can all of them even be mentioned?
One could also analyze the activities of all these Inglingi and consider the specifics. Only a very reasonable question: why? Is it not obvious that a redistribution of power is happening in this sect? Is it not clear that Rodnovers are being stupefied? At the end of this section, I would like to quote the statement of Rodnover communities on the topic of pseudo-paganism:
http://yggeld.livejournal.com/49791.html
Conclusions
Self-respecting Rodnovers have long since begun a struggle against Ingliism as a natural disaster, as a provocation, and as any sect. One often hears the argument of the Inglingi that Rodnovers and they have nothing to divide—the Slavic faith is one and its essence is one! They try to find a compromise that cannot exist, because Ingliism substituted many concepts and eventually turned everything upside down. Ingliism is the main destructive element; it is by this that any Rodnover is characterized, and washing off this filth is very, very difficult, if possible at all. Ingliism is not Slavic paganism (they do not use this word at all; for them it means foreigners and non-believers). According to Vadim Kazakov's concise designation, Ingliists are "White-paranoid and rakomoltsy." According to Rodnovers, wherever the Inglingi appear, everything collapses: people eventually quarrel, industrial artels and communities break up. What was intended by Khinevich to unite Slavs actually defiled and divided them. And from the last quotes, I would like to bring the words of one Rodnover: "Looking for rational grains in Ingliism is like looking for gold in a chamber pot."
Added after 3 minutes
Frequently asked questions about Ingliism (i.e., the fetish of the ariputra)
http://slaviy.ru/faq-po-ingliizmu/
Земля нуля.
Все в ней нулево и кукольно.
Все в ней нулево и кукольно.