Forum

Every day, more and more warriors arrived on the Kurukshetra battlefield, 99% of whom died on the battlefield that same day. Who is going to feed them?
At night, the corpses were removed and burned.
All the kings of the world participated in this battle. Please name at least one logical reason why it was impossible to gather 650 million warriors from all over the world?

2 ariputra.
Okay, let's talk about logic. The battle lasted 18 days, and 650 million warriors fought. 650 divided by 18 gives us an average of 36 million people fighting each day, of which more than 35 million died each day.

1. To remove their corpses from the battlefield, you need a comparable number of servants, who also want to eat and must be alive throughout the battle to do their job. What will you feed them with?
2. Burn 35 million people a day? There would be such a smell in the area that all living things would die from suffocation. Burn more than 600 million corpses in one place in a little more than two weeks?
3. And the wounded? It is clear that the victorious army finished off all the wounded on the losing side, but they always collected their own, including fathers, brothers, mentors, and friends. For more than half of the 18 days, it was unclear who was winning, so both sides collected the wounded. There were a huge number of them; okay, they were placed on the first day of the battle, but what happened to the rest? Hundreds of millions of groaning, screaming people in pain, whose friends, fathers, and brothers they were.
The armies would revolt, demanding a break to evacuate so many wounded; battles of such intensity would happen at most once a week, even considering the animosity between the sides.

Hitler was also a half-Jewish, if you are interested, read Mein Kampf:

If Hitler had won that war, the people in Russia would be living in much better conditions now! In the territories he managed to capture, he allowed peasants to continue farming freely, provided loans to peasants to continue agriculture, and did not destroy Orthodox or Christian churches (unlike our Jewish government). He did not harm the people.

In your own words. ))) If the half-Jewish Hitler had won that war, the people in Russia would be living in much better conditions now! )))
How does this relate to your previous posts?

Regarding the territories he managed to capture, my Ukrainian grandmother told me. First, they shot and hanged the commissars and Jews, then those who sympathized with them, then those suspected of being half-Jewish, half-commissars, half-sympathizers... then those who remained were driven like cattle into slavery in Germany, although even that is not quite accurate; they treat cattle better, and there people died by the hundreds.

Yes, you are right, I really write illiterately, for which I apologize.

But please explain to me how we say, pronounce: poydyosh, or poydesh?

What is the basis for this rule? It would be okay if it were based on the etymology of the word? But in this case, why should there be a soft sign after "sh"?

Spelling should be based on the etymology of words in order to ensure their correct pronunciation in the future, but today's rules are based on something unclear and are constantly changing.

And it turns out that you check the spelling in Word, that is, you don't even write so грамотно yourself – but you criticize me for not knowing Russian. You are a funny person.

And in general, what Russian language are you talking about?
1) In pre-Christian Rus', in the Old Slavic language, there were 147 letters, just like in modern Sanskrit.
2) 1000 years ago, the benefactors of all Rus', the two Greek Jews Cyril and Methodius, reduced it to 53 letters.
3) Under Peter the Great, to 47, then to 43.
4) Under Nicholas II, to 37.
5) During the USSR, to 33.
6) Now they want to reduce it to 28.
7) And ideally, our Jewish government wants to reduce our alphabet to 24 letters, like in modern Hebrew.

And turn us into Ellachka the man-eater, reducing our vocabulary to 30 words.

Poydyosh, or poydesh? Is there a difference for you? You shortened a letter in a word - and that's it. So how are you different from the "masons" who do the same thing? They shorten the Russian language - and you shorten it; you both do the same job.

I don't check texts in Word, although I should. I was just interested in the alternative word suggested for "corporate events" on the computer where I was typing.

I have no hatred for them; they are just the executors of our karma, voluntarily taking on this burden. But that does not mean that we should obediently put our heads in the guillotine (drug addiction, alcoholism, and depravity with vaccination) that they have prepared for all of us.

A convenient position. I drink, and the masons are to blame; they made me. I get vaccinated - again, the masons. I grab underage girls - it's only because of them. I'm lazy - because of them, I eat a lot, and I've grown a belly - they are to blame too. Explanations have been found for all problems, and my conscience is clear.

At that time, Germany and Russia were two of the most powerful states, both militarily and economically, while America, ruled by Jews, was not such at that time. So they decided to pit two Aryan empires against each other, making a good profit from blood and guts.

How does this relate to your earlier claims that the Jewish Bolsheviks destroyed Russia? If you claim that, along with Germany, the country was one of the two greatest in 1941, then maybe they didn't destroy anything?

Finally, about the giants. Of course, the Pandavas, Kauravas, and their warriors were giants, the most remarkable of the Aryans.
Now imagine - 650 million warriors, their wives, their parents, and their children - all giants. And so, generation after generation. That's billions and billions of buried giant people.
Consider the work that humanity is doing - constant construction, earthworks, excavations. Throughout Eurasia, not dozens, but millions of huge skulls would be found, and no people in black could hide this.

I agree with you that the Mahabharata is a great thing; if you haven't read it, you should. If not the whole thing, then at least the Bhishmaparva, about the first 10 days of the battle. I have no doubt that in ancient times there was a huge battle that remained in memory for its drama and the scale of the people involved. Not 650 million giant kshatriyas, but with the participation of perhaps tens or hundreds of thousands.

http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%91%D1%85%D0%B8%D1%88%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BF%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B2%D0%B0

Although I don't quite understand how, with all these kshatriyas, rajputs, and marathas with such a huge population, India was enslaved by other peoples for hundreds of years, from the Afghans to the British. The same problem with China, from the Khitans, Mongols, and Manchus to the Japanese and British; the rulers were foreigners for hundreds of years.