CTPAHHuK
Auto-translated
RAVEN
I read it carefully and noticed a few mistakes and things I didn't understand.
Firstly, regarding the quote:
1) It says "2. The sound will be great as always" and then immediately "4. Music by Rob King". Aren't these the same thing? :)
2) You mention that the game "3. is based on Heroes 3" and then talk about excluding features from Heroes 4: "7. The absence of the fog of war, the hero entering the battlefield, simultaneous attacks, and other questionable features from Heroes 4". If you're going to start listing features that were not included from Heroes 1, 2, and 4, the list will artificially increase.
Secondly, regarding the post:
1) You write about the character progression "5. The uniqueness of each race (and racial abilities) forces you to develop heroes of different races in completely different ways - a huge step forward compared to all previous parts;", and also "6. Magic. Both as a skill progression system and the effect of spells on the battlefield, especially the increased role of direct damage spells + abilities that add additional properties to such spells (Master of ...). The idea of enhanced spells that cost double mana is also interesting, but it doesn't work yet (I was pleasantly surprised by the implementation of mass buffs (the fact that they became area-of-effect) - now you don't have to worry that some dumb barbarian with mass haste will instantly defeat a larger army);"... but why then generalize with "13. The hero progression system has become the best of all the schemes I've seen, because it again combines all the best that has been and introduces new features;"?
2) How is your point "14. Heroes are not a REVOLUTION, but an EVOLUTION;" better than, for example, "Heroes are not an EVOLUTION, but a REVOLUTION;"? What do you mean by the words written in capital letters? And what is the advantage of Evolution over Revolution?
3) Finally, I don't understand from the point of view of truthfulness "12. The game has gathered all the best from all parts of Heroes;". I don't want to start an argument about whether this is your opinion or a misconception. I just ask you to answer one question: "What is the best thing from Heroes 4 that is included in the upcoming Heroes 5"?
I read it carefully and noticed a few mistakes and things I didn't understand.
Firstly, regarding the quote:
1) It says "2. The sound will be great as always" and then immediately "4. Music by Rob King". Aren't these the same thing? :)
2) You mention that the game "3. is based on Heroes 3" and then talk about excluding features from Heroes 4: "7. The absence of the fog of war, the hero entering the battlefield, simultaneous attacks, and other questionable features from Heroes 4". If you're going to start listing features that were not included from Heroes 1, 2, and 4, the list will artificially increase.
Secondly, regarding the post:
1) You write about the character progression "5. The uniqueness of each race (and racial abilities) forces you to develop heroes of different races in completely different ways - a huge step forward compared to all previous parts;", and also "6. Magic. Both as a skill progression system and the effect of spells on the battlefield, especially the increased role of direct damage spells + abilities that add additional properties to such spells (Master of ...). The idea of enhanced spells that cost double mana is also interesting, but it doesn't work yet (I was pleasantly surprised by the implementation of mass buffs (the fact that they became area-of-effect) - now you don't have to worry that some dumb barbarian with mass haste will instantly defeat a larger army);"... but why then generalize with "13. The hero progression system has become the best of all the schemes I've seen, because it again combines all the best that has been and introduces new features;"?
2) How is your point "14. Heroes are not a REVOLUTION, but an EVOLUTION;" better than, for example, "Heroes are not an EVOLUTION, but a REVOLUTION;"? What do you mean by the words written in capital letters? And what is the advantage of Evolution over Revolution?
3) Finally, I don't understand from the point of view of truthfulness "12. The game has gathered all the best from all parts of Heroes;". I don't want to start an argument about whether this is your opinion or a misconception. I just ask you to answer one question: "What is the best thing from Heroes 4 that is included in the upcoming Heroes 5"?