Forum

Tomorrow? How many years has the theory of physics been feeding us such "tomorrows"?

And Jews, of course, must be loved—for intoxicating and corrupting the youth, for flooding Russia with drug addiction, for destroying the army, industry, healthcare, education, agriculture, etc. For wanting to turn Russia into a raw materials appendage and shove the surviving population into reservations, just as they already did with the Indians in America. What else is left to do but love them for this?

People invented god and people were the ones who killed in the name of god, because personally for me faith and religion are different things.
Returning to the quote from your post God cannot be the general designer of nature and even less so of this universe for one simple reason: he was invented by people

Repin's painting: "We've arrived!"

Factually, you are claiming that there is no God; factually, you are an atheist. I have nothing against atheists; it is their right. I won't even try to convince you otherwise.

People did not kill in the name of God, but by using God as a cover for their own selfish motives. Covering their selfish motives—power, glory, wealth—with God. Please see this difference.

Faith is complete conviction in something based on knowledge.
Religion is the eternal duty of a living being to God, in accordance with His laws for the material world in which we all live.

But you say that people invented God, therefore He does not exist. Then the question arises: Who created such a harmonious structure as the universe, as the earth? Who created the laws that physics describes? Who is this legislator?
When will those "people who invented God" invent (create) a harmonious structure like the universe or the earth? When will those "people who invented God" invent their own laws, rather than just describing them?

When will materialistic science—instead of killing life (with atomic bombs, viruses)—create even one small life? Even one small seed from which a tree will later grow?


If a concept exists, then the object described by that concept must also exist. If there were no God, such a concept would not exist in principle.

But God does not force Himself on anyone; if you don't want to believe, please do so.
Ancient Eastern wisdom:
"To him who desires oblivion, God grants oblivion".

Added after 17 minutes
Vaccines are completely safe

The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) was established by Congress in accordance with the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. This system receives about 11000 reports annually regarding serious complications from vaccinations, which include between one hundred and two hundred deaths, and several times more cases of lifelong disability [1]. VAERS officials report that 15% of complication cases are "serious" (ambulance transport, hospitalization, life-threatening cases, lifelong disability, death). Independent analysis of reports received by VAERS showed that up to 50% of the known cases of complications from the hepatitis B vaccine are "serious" [2]. While this figure is alarming in itself, it is only the "tip of the iceberg." According to FDA estimates, reports are filed for only 1% of serious vaccination complications [3] [4], and the CDC admits that only about 10% of such cases are reported [5]. In fact, Congress heard testimony that medical students are advised not to report suspected complication cases [6].

The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC, a grassroots organization created by parents of children injured or killed by vaccines) conducted its own investigations [7]. It reported: "In New York, only one out of 40 healthcare facilities confirmed that they report deaths or illnesses following vaccination." In other words, 97.5% of vaccine-related deaths and disabilities remain hidden. We will not delve into a discussion of medical ethics (federal law requires doctors to report cases of serious complications [8]), but these data suggest that the actual number of deaths and serious injuries from vaccinations each year could be 10-100 times higher than the reported amount.

As for pertussis, the number of vaccine-related deaths overshadows the number of deaths from the disease, which according to CDC data has been about 10 cases annually for many years and only 8 in 1993, when there was one of the last peaks of incidence (pertussis comes in cycles of 3-4 years; why—no one knows, but vaccination levels do not have such cycles). Given the factor of incomplete reporting, the vaccine could be 100 times more lethal than the disease. Some argue that this is a necessary price to prevent the return of the disease, which could be more lethal than the vaccine. But if we take into account the fact that most diseases declined in the 20th century before the widespread use of vaccination (pertussis mortality decreased by 79% before vaccinations), and that the incidence rate remained practically unchanged after mass immunization began, then today's same accidents from vaccines can hardly be reasonably considered an inevitable sacrifice for the benefit of a disease-free society.

Unfortunately, the story of vaccine-related deaths does not end there. Studies in different countries have shown that vaccination is a cause of SIDS [9] [10] (SIDS is "Sudden Infant Death Syndrome," an "all-encompassing" diagnosis given when no specific cause of death is known; in the USA, it is estimated at 5000 - 10000 cases per year).

One study showed that SIDS frequency peaks in the US occur at 2 and 4 months of age, exactly when the first two scheduled vaccinations are given [11]; another found a pronounced correlation within three weeks after immunization. Yet another study showed that annually in the US, 3000 children die within 4 days after vaccination (surprisingly, the authors do not report a link between SIDS and vaccines); other researchers' works conclude that at least half of SIDS cases are caused by vaccinations [12].

Initial studies suggesting a causal link between SIDS and vaccines were quickly followed by others funded by vaccine manufacturers, which concluded there was no link; one claimed that the frequency of SIDS in vaccinated infants was slightly lower. However, many of these studies were questioned by others showing that results were erroneously altered in favor of vaccinations due to "confusion" [13]. At best, we have contradictory evidence. Should we not err on the side of caution? Should any credible correlation between vaccines and infant deaths not be a reason for thorough, large-scale control of the vaccination that took place in all SIDS cases?

In the mid-70s, Japan raised the vaccination age from 2 months to 2 years, and their SIDS frequency dropped sharply [14]; they moved from an infant mortality rate of 17 to first place in the world (i.e., Japan had the lowest infant mortality when infants were not immunized). In England, the vaccination level was temporarily reduced to about 30% around the same time, following media reports of vaccine-related brain damage. Infant mortality dropped significantly for about 2 years, then rose again in close correlation with the increased immunization rate in the late 1970s. Despite these facts, the US medical community took a position of denial. Coroners are not interested in the vaccination status of SIDS victims, and unsuspecting families continue to pay a high price, unaware of the dangers and without the right to make a conscious choice.
Admissions from the FDA and CDC about insufficient reporting of complications suggest that the total number of complications actually occurring annually could be between 100,000 and one million (of which "serious" ones account for about 20%). This is emphasized by a study showing that 1 out of 175 children who received the full course of DPT vaccinations had "strong reactions" [15], and a doctor's report for lawyers claiming that 1 out of 300 DPT vaccinations leads to seizures [16].

In fact, England observed a drop in pertussis mortality when the vaccination level decreased to 30% in the mid-70s. A study on the effectiveness and toxicity of the pertussis vaccine worldwide, conducted by Swedish epidemiologist B. Trollfors, found that "pertussis-related mortality is now very low in industrial countries, with no difference detected when comparing countries with high, low, and zero immunization levels." He also found that England, Wales, and West Germany in 1970, when the immunization level was high, had higher pertussis mortality than in the second half of the 1980s, when this level had decreased [17].

Vaccination costs us not only the lives and health of our children. The US federal same government vaccine injury compensation program (NVICP) has paid more than 1.2 billion dollars since 1988 to parents of children injured or killed by vaccinations [18], using money obtained from taxes paid by vaccine recipients. Meanwhile, pharmaceutical companies have a captured market: vaccinations are legally mandatory in all 50 US states (although in most cases they can be legally avoided, see Myth #9), even though these companies themselves are "immunized" from liability for the consequences of their products' use. Moreover, they are allowed to use "gag" clauses in legal agreements regarding vaccine harm as a leverage tool to prevent the public dissemination of information about the dangers of vaccination. Such agreements are obviously unethical; they force a dissenting American public to pay compensation for damage caused by vaccine manufacturers while simultaneously trying to ensure that same public remains unaware of the dangers of their products. This provision also reduces any incentives that might drive manufacturers to release safer vaccines (after all, when a vaccine causes death or health damage, they do not have to pay for it; they continue to receive their profit).

It is important to note that insurance companies (which conduct the best research on compensation) refuse to cover post-vaccination complications. It is clear that profit determines the positions of both pharmaceutical and insurance companies.