Ihtiandr
Pascal turned out to be not a foolish fellow — he cleverly deceived the priests. I think there is a good interpretation of his wager. This caught my eye immediately, but I was too lazy to write about it, so as not to start a religious debate. In a nutshell, any mathematician understands that Pascal's equations need to be somewhat expanded and the probabilities evaluated more precisely. So, if God exists, THEN even in the case of unbelief, He guarantees eternal life for the soul, and likewise with the salvation of the soul — live according to your conscience, your soul will be pure. Therefore, that variable will have to be removed from the second pan of the scale. Then we make an assessment: there is no evidence of God's existence, so the probability estimate for case 2 is infinitesimally small, while case 1 approaches 100. As a result, we have 1) a number close to 100 multiplied by the rewards, and 2) an infinitesimally small number multiplied by the costs. So this cunning Pascal wrote a wager that defines an educated person.