It's in the works, it's in the works. I suggest we return to a specific discussion about the ranking after the first round of the Heroes of Might and Magic tournament is over. Once we have data from five stages, each with its own version of Heroes, we can calculate everything and determine the pros and cons of all ranking versions. For now, I'll calculate based on both, and then we'll see.
My system is still under development :) I'm listening to the criticism :)
I read the discussion between AmberSoler, Kule, and Tokha. I'm completely on AmberSoler's side. However, I still disagree with AmberSoler regarding the second component of the ranking. It is more important than the first component, but I still think that the current ranking should be based not on the number of participants and the places they took, but specifically on the results of each day and how close they are to the leader based on these results.
I'm attaching a file with a slightly modified ranking system that doesn't include the second component, along with an explanation of why I think this way.