Forum

Okay, I'll try to outline my perspective. Firstly, Ariputra has repeatedly relied on demonstrably false evidence, quotes, demotivators, the Allen Dulles plan, the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, and information about vaccinations. The Allen Dulles plan, as is known to discerning individuals, is a compilation created to attract neophytes to the banner of those fighting against a global conspiracy. For example, regarding "Eternal Call," I won't provide quotes here that clearly confirm the falsity of the Dulles plan; I'll just say that Ariputra, due to his ignorance, once again managed to provide a link to an ENGLISH TEXT that has a significantly DIFFERENT meaning than the Russian version. Furthermore, for someone who speaks English at a decent level, it is obvious that the so-called Dulles plan could not have existed in any of the Romance languages; it uses exclusively phrases characteristic of Slavic languages. Regarding the Protocols, things are even more interesting: a very interesting correlation is found with the fictional work "Dialogue of Machiavelli and Montesquieu in HELL"; I'm not guaranteeing the accuracy of the title, but again, all of this is publicly available. Also, a linguistic analysis of the text of the "Protocols" is quite curious; I'll refer you to the relevant open sources. I must admit, I don't possess the same breadth of knowledge as Ariputra, who is ready to fight for anything, from elephants in orbit to AIDS denial. But at the very least, it's quite foolish to deny that vaccinations against whooping cough and scarlet fever have eliminated these diseases from the list of life-threatening ones. There was even a poem in Soviet times about the death of a pioneer from scarlet fever. Moreover, comparing infant mortality in the 20th century with what it was before is somewhat absurd; the difference is many times greater. So, what seems to me to be one of the specific characteristics of Ariputra's style? I've noticed that he often writes conclusions that are completely opposite in meaning, and he does so with the same pathos. Secondly, he was clearly raised on POPULAR SCIENCE. Serious literature is difficult for him; it seems to depress him, so he also presents himself in a popular science style. Specifically, when he is asked to provide documents, even just about excavations, he prints comics with skulls; I could just as easily dig up clips of ghosts from YouTube and use that as evidence to prove the existence of a poltergeist. Ariputra, in every picture, you need to indicate the source, and also in any of your statements that rely on any events. This is one of the reasons why no serious person will take your arguments seriously (or is this just a "retransmission"?). Regarding Jews, I certainly won't presume to judge everything with the authority of Ariputra, but according to him, Jews appear to be some kind of exceptional carriers of something special, almost like people from another planet. In reality, the situation takes on a different perspective. Jews are NOT a nationality in the common sense of the word. ANY person can become a Jew (although there are still exceptions) who is willing to undergo the ritual. Moreover, prominent figures even in ancient Jewish history (King David) were not descendants of Jews but were so-called "gerim," that is, non-Jews who adopted Judaism. From this perspective, any attempt to paint a global conspiracy in Jewish colors seems relatively schizoid. Given that Ariputra has been trained to be negative towards Jews, I will provide a link to a website for those who are interested in learning something about Judaism: www.toldot.ru