Forum

Ariputra is right about one thing - unlike his opponents, he doubted the truthfulness of the information presented to us by the system. I am in complete solidarity with him on this. Thinking begins with doubt, not with mechanical memorization of "facts."

But otherwise, his posts contain excessively extreme exaggerations - I really dislike it when everything is lumped together under one umbrella:

100% of vaccinations are harmful and dangerous for everyone

Mass epidemics of those diseases that vaccines are trying to protect us from began precisely with the appearance of vaccinations, mass vaccinations.

How, interestingly, did people live before without vaccinations, without mass vaccinations, and were much healthier than we are?

all Jews (kikes) are enemies of humanity, etc.

I did not say all, only those cannibals who are now destroying Russia and its indigenous population (as it happens, they are all Jews) - with drug addiction, alcohol, debauchery, mass vaccinations, only those - who committed genocide against the Serbs and broke up Yugoslavia, only those who stage coups and physically eliminate rulers they don't like, only those who cause global "economic crises" (during which the number of dollar billionaires only increases while the people become impoverished), only those who have prepared the fate of Indians in reservations for Russians, Belarusians, Ukrainians, and other Slavs.

Plus, blatantly inadequate "facts" of his own are presented

And on what basis do you characterize this or that event or statement as inadequate?

Based on your previous experience, which you consider absolutely correct?

The whole problem lies in the rigidity of our thinking.
We think that everything that does not fit into our understanding, that goes beyond its limits, is pure nonsense.

Everything that contradicts the experience I have gained in the past (with which I now identify myself) can have no right to exist.

And anyone can call something nonsense, without proof, that does not fit into our understanding of reality.

(like some miraculously unburned elephants in the dense layers of the atmosphere - even if we allow the existence of some kind of Indian Hulk :) on orbit).

First of all, there are testimonies of astronauts (from whom, naturally, a non-disclosure agreement was obtained under pain of death). But you can't hide an awl in a sack.

And since certain facts do not fit into the general official dominant picture of the universe, into the general picture of humanity's past, no one will ever officially tell about them. Moreover, they will try to hide them.

Any of us, and I undoubtedly - can naturally be mistaken.
We make mistakes 1000 times a day.
_____________________

But the Maha-Bharata is part of Vedic literature - which does not make mistakes in its analysis, in its conclusions. We simply do not have an understanding of what the Vedas are (This is the science of sciences and the religion of religions). There is not a single fiction or exaggeration in it. A huge number of facts described there have found archaeological confirmation. Others simply have not been checked. But some statements, naturally, cannot be verified empirically.

For example, no one has ever seen an atom with their own eyes; it was determined by secondary characteristics.
but we accepted this information as truth, having no proof whatsoever.

99% of information we take on faith! We are told that Australia exists, they show pictures on TV, they show people who supposedly have been there - and we believe. But what guarantee is there that we are not being deceived, where is the proof? Maybe Australia doesn't exist at all, and everyone who supposedly leaves for there ends up in another part of Eurasia or South America and becomes slaves in underground mines.

But no! We don't even question this information about the existence of Australia (I, for example, have never been there)! And what does not fit into our matrix of understanding, into our patterns of reality - we determine as 100% nonsense.

No one has yet managed to scientifically refute a single statement from any section of the Vedas.
__________________________

Secondly, objects burn up when entering the dense layers of the atmosphere, not when exiting it.

But if you still consider this to be pure nonsense - fly there, check it, refute it.

It is obviously either immature youthful maximalism, or some kind of encoded special type of trolling (all these kilometer-long wall-of-texts with a stupid mistake in almost every word) - there is no third option.

All the local trolls have already managed to call me a troll; the hounds are onto the hare :) Whoever is guilty of something, they accused me of that.

I apologize for the mistakes I made; I try to write correctly, but what is the point of clinging to the form, to the wrapper, while paying no attention to the content?

But on the other hand, those who do this can be understood; other than shoving your nose into the wall-of-text and the mistakes, there is nothing left to do.

Ancient Eastern wisdom:
"Everyone thinks of others what they themselves are". This entire world is perceived by us through the prism of our mind; whatever our mind is like, that is how we will see the surrounding world and people.