Forum

I have a degree in history, so I think I know better.
I have an archaeologist friend, and she also calls what you're talking about a fairy tale for uneducated people, which you apparently are.
I don't like to write a lot; I prefer to talk. And I'm not going to read through kilometers of various PR endorsements of your book.

It's low and questionable to write like this and make so many mistakes in Russian, like you do – sometimes missing soft signs, not using them with verbs, etc.

Yes, I make mistakes in spelling words, but at the same time, I don't insult people I don't know, and I'm not insulting you. But you allow yourself to do that, to insult people just because they have different views, opinions, and conclusions than you do. You nitpick about some mistakes in spelling words, about the form – without paying any attention to the essence.

The history of the past, our past, is unpredictable!

The conclusions that Michael Cremo and Richard Thompson come to as a result of 8 years of work are confirmed by archaeological facts that can be verified!

And what confirms that history (istorriya), what confirms your conclusions and the conclusions of your archaeologist friend? How can you verify the validity of your conclusions? How can you verify the conclusions of the history you studied at the institute, which directly contradicts the conclusions of "Unknown History of Humanity"? Are there archaeological proofs?

PR endorsements? Provide at least one piece of evidence that these are PR endorsements; otherwise, you are just a sophist and are not accountable for your words.

Please provide at least 1/10 of the same statements about the books you studied in the institute!

The official, government-backed "scientific-historical" Community is against this work because it exposes all their years of deception.

______

You are a historian by education, and the authors of the book are experts in their field of science; the opinions about the book are also written by experts in their field of knowledge. But you are undoubtedly a more qualified and knowledgeable person in the field of archaeology and the history of humanity!

The opinions of scientists and experts in various fields who are not affiliated with the government are not authoritative for you! But what is an authoritative source of knowledge for you? The official, state-funded history?