Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

To Kyle. Rating is not just about a player's strength. The question is: is strength a constant concept, or does it change from tournament to tournament? Most likely, it's a constant, established at a given point in time. Of course, a player's strength gradually increases – they gain experience. But this is, on average, not very fast. However, a rating can change from tournament to tournament, which means that, in addition to the player's strength, it also takes into account their tournament activity. And tournament statistics provide informative data. But the results can be displayed according to an alphabetical list of players. And being first in the list doesn't mean that this player is the strongest at the moment. This is where you can see how many times a particular player participated in tournaments during the season. But you shouldn't compare them to each other. The current rating has a different purpose – to compare players at a given point in time. This is the current rating, and this is what we are discussing. All your ideas are applicable to an annual rating. Only, instead of using the arithmetic mean, you need to consider the sum of all results, and it will depend on the number of games that will be taken into account. For example, the 10 best games of the season are included in the rating. Those who have played fewer than 10 games do not participate in the annual rating. Added 3 minutes ago

yes, the numbers aren't the main thing. I was suggesting a system.

That's it! These are the key words! You are suggesting a system. A different system. I'm not against it – feel free to suggest it. Let the tournament organizers consider it and decide whether it suits them or not. I won't argue with you, and especially not with them. We're not saying that one is better and the other is worse. They are just different, but we can't compare two completely different systems. And it won't be possible to combine them... My calculations don't have room for the coefficients you are suggesting... Because the rating in my system and in Iron's system is calculated each time from scratch, based on the results of the tournament. That was the idea. We are simply offering an alternative to the rating that VDV_forever proposed at one time. You are offering the same thing that he had. That is, there is nothing new in your system. What is the point of returning to something that has already been rejected once? And the rating is calculated separately for each version of the game. We are not combining the third and fifth versions yet... How Alex will calculate in the ВК tournament – ask him.