GriB_o.k.
Auto-translated
Yes, the numbers aren't the main thing. I was proposing a system.
As for the numbers... the numbers should be chosen so that if a player takes, say, first and tenth place in two Tournaments, they will ultimately rank higher than a player who took fifth place both times. For example:
1st place - 75 points
2nd place - 55 points
3rd place - 40 points
4th place - 30 points
5th place - 23 points
6th place - 17 points
7th place - 12 points
8th place - 8 points
9th place - 5 points
10th place - 3 points
But the main thing is that the points do not depend on either the number of players or the level of the tournament. And those who didn't make it into the top ten receive no points.
As for the numbers... the numbers should be chosen so that if a player takes, say, first and tenth place in two Tournaments, they will ultimately rank higher than a player who took fifth place both times. For example:
1st place - 75 points
2nd place - 55 points
3rd place - 40 points
4th place - 30 points
5th place - 23 points
6th place - 17 points
7th place - 12 points
8th place - 8 points
9th place - 5 points
10th place - 3 points
But the main thing is that the points do not depend on either the number of players or the level of the tournament. And those who didn't make it into the top ten receive no points.
Get What You Want