Please post all questions, suggestions, and comments in this thread.
First, why do we need aging? Could we do without it? To do that, we would then need to maintain two ratings: "General" and "Current". General is the sum of all ratings from all tournaments in which a player participated. Current is General/number of tournaments in which the player participated.
Consequently, the current rating shows the average strength of the player, while the General rating shows how long ago and how often a participant has been entering tournaments. For example, for the Van Kanigem tournament, the winner would be determined by the General (for that tournament) rating!
If such a system is introduced, the rating for first place in all tournaments must be the same number.
I would be happy to hear your opinion.