Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

Should we close the poll? Is it normal that the questions were completely rewritten and I was falsely credited as the author? I asked a clear question: "Should the members of the Arbitration Committee hold their positions for life?" Instead, the question was distorted beyond recognition, and my signature was left under it.

I demand a public decision on the question I posed.
Not a personal comment, but a public one.
If the Arbitration Committee is afraid of revenge from someone on the forum, and is therefore silent, don't be afraid; I've seen the guys from the bay, they are normal, adequate people, Alex is a pleasant person with a refined creative taste.

Qwerty, you're like a little child whose candy was taken away. The poll is nonsense. And your wording is too. Why? Hmm... you tried to give one answer a negative connotation. For example, 2 options to choose from: 1) Vigo is white and fluffy, he didn't violate anything and didn't deceive anyone, unban him. 2) Keep the ban in effect. Do you feel the bias?

Regarding the public decision... Read the topic carefully.
Pay attention to the fact that Medium was Alex's opponent and his interests were directly affected.
I'll give you an idea

I have no intention of refusing to play new games with Alex, provided he agrees with my position on the rules.

P.S. Does the Arbitration Committee consider "political" requests? I think it's clear that Qwerty is trying to create discord and simply destroy HW. If it is possible to prove this convincingly, will this action be subject to a ban?