Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I assume it's easier to undermine the decisions of the Arbitration Committee when you have your own, compliant people there. If there is no unity within the Arbitration Committee itself, it will, by definition, be unable to make any legitimate decisions, which in turn will be a reason for constant re-elections of its members and, as a result, the complete abolition or replacement of the Arbitration Committee with some other "supervisory body." It's strange that the topic starter didn't anticipate exactly this reaction from your community to this topic in light of recent events. Or maybe he did... :) P.S. If anyone has questions again about who I am and what I'm doing here, I'll answer: I'm drawing on positive experiences.