Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Querty, stop embarrassing yourself... your posts are making everyone laugh... you may be excused, but you're either covering for Vigo or you're just stupid... The decision that was made is justified, or do you really believe in Vigo's honesty??
Lider1
It seems like Querty wants to put anyone in the Arbitration Committee (AK), as long as it's not the current members of the AK. And people who are easy to manipulate. Because the decision regarding Vigo was unfair. Well, well, how many people will actually agree to join the AK and deal with these controversial situations? When 99.9% is not a basis for proof :D Go ahead and sing.
:))) What, is your conscience bothering you? Calm down, this isn't about that.
I don't see any answers to the questions that were posed to the AK, including the ones with screenshots. The AK's work is not transparent, which is why they separated themselves from the entire forum. That's what I'm talking about.
Qwerty
