Skip to content

Shades of Darkness - Discussion

User Avatar
#25
Auto-translated
Adagio
I believe this letter, at least because after its publication, no refutation followed from "Ubisoft."

But why should Ubisoft comment on a comment that appeared from an unknown source and was immediately deleted by the user?

According to Russian insider LaBoule, he spoke with Irina about this "post-mortem" and she explained Ubi's position.

http://forums.ag.ru/?board=heroes6&action=display&s=0&num=1318301734&start=475#494

And why should Ubi apologize? Draw public attention to this message when most fans don't even know about it?
Adagio
Indirect arguments in favor of the truthfulness of the "Black Hole" employee's statement may be the games created by the Hungarians earlier (normal creation conditions and, as a result, a decent result).

But, in my opinion, they are rather mediocre games. In any case, Heroes 6 is not their worst creation.
Adagio
and the comments from "Nival" regarding the contract for the development of the sixth installment, which was exploitative in its essence.

The quote about the exploitative nature of the publisher's terms belongs to Sergey Orlovsky:

http://habrahabr.ru/post/101944/#comment_3163110

There's also a smiley there. A smiley usually means a joke or irony.

Adagio, overall, I understand your anger. I myself was very angry after reading that post-mortem. But now I've more or less weighed the arguments and I think that you can't look at the world in black and white. Ubi is certainly to blame for something. But I prefer to believe that the fate of Heroes is not in the hands of monstrous fascists, ready to kill their own mother for a couple of euros. :)