To Vigo or not to Vigo? That is the question.

Psychological portrait? Pete, I'm sorry, but why do you care what kind of person he is? I don't remember you creating psychological portraits in previous investigations... Kilgore and Co., what the hell are you dragging personal financial matters into this? These are his problems, and he should solve them himself. He either has a conscience or he doesn't, but you're planning to ban him for it. Putting a "black mark" on him as an organizer is one thing, but banning him as a player is absurd. Furthermore, Vigo and Vigoboy, even if they helped out in the past, so what? A few years ago, my father was also registered on Heroes of Might and Magic, and due to unforeseen circumstances, I had to finish a couple of games for him or make a few moves. Is that grounds for a ban? He's an amateur now, plays against the computer, sometimes watches my game while having a beer, and even gave me advice on Facebook about a spell he couldn't figure out himself. We even won that Facebook game. I know of other examples with other players, but I won't bring them up. Next, a maphack that isn't 100% proven isn't considered a maphack. I didn't detect any here, and while the circumstances are strange, there were millions of similar strange occurrences before the saves were corrupted, and many of those players are still playing and nothing happened... If you're so sure about Vigo's maphack, then force him to play with password-protected saves. What's the problem? Conclusion: Vigo may not have great skills or a conscience, but putting a "black mark" on him based on "trifles" is absurd.