To Vigo or not to Vigo? That is the question.

What I don't understand is Vigo's logic:

Let's say the majority votes for him; that wouldn't surprise me at all – many don't want to delve into the issue and simply don't want to punish someone, no matter what they've done; many know Vigo in real life and won't want to ruin their relationship with him; Qwerty will rally his entire clan, and so on. That's not the point.

To avoid "biased" voting at someone's request and to hear the opinions of players who are truly familiar with Vigo and the third game, it's enough to introduce a voting threshold based on several parameters: registration date, the number of reports on games played in the third game online. Something like that. To minimize the distortion of the forum members' real opinions.