To Vigo or not to Vigo? That is the question.

Kostya, please don't delete this:
1. I think Vigo is openly mocking AK. In court, for disrespecting him, this is resolved very quickly: from a fine to administrative arrest. Mockery won't work there.
2. I don't see the point in trying to get answers from Vigo to questions that have been asked 125 times. It's obvious that if he doesn't want to answer them, he won't. Continuing the flood in the topic is a way to conclude that everything is vague and unclear, and if that's the case, then the accusations should be dropped.
3. I believe that, in any case, everyone has the right to a public trial. And the main goal of AK is to serve the players. If Vigo asks the public to assess this problem, then let the public assess it; this cannot be denied. It (the public) is the source of power that AK was endowed with. It's like a referendum, if you want.
4. If AK has anything else to present before the vote, it needs to do so. Accordingly, Vigo should comment on AK's new arguments.
The Heroes community is not stupid; they will draw conclusions and reflect them in the vote.
For this event, set a clear deadline (say, until the end of the week) and close the topic for that time.