1. In my opinion, Vigo is openly mocking the Arbitration Committee (AK). In court, for disrespecting them, this is resolved very quickly: from a fine to administrative arrest. Mockery won't work there.
2. I don't see the point in trying to extract answers from Vigo to questions that have been asked 125 times. It's obvious that if he doesn't want to answer them, he won't. Continuing the flood in the thread is a method to conclude that everything is vague and unclear, and if that's the case, then the accusations should be dropped.
3. I believe that, regardless, everyone has the right to a trial by public opinion. And the main goal of creating the AK is to serve the players. If Vigo asks the public to give an assessment of this problem, then let the public give it; this cannot be denied. It (the public) is the source of the power that the AK was given. It's like a referendum, if you will.
4. If the AK has anything else to present before the vote, it needs to do so. Accordingly, Vigo should comment on the AK's new arguments.
The Heroes community is not stupid; they will draw conclusions and reflect them in the vote.
For this event, set a clear deadline (say, until the end of the week), and close the thread for that time.