I think everything is clear here. There are no specific questions from the prosecution. Why are you all harassing him? It's obvious he's not guilty. They want to discredit the person.
It's impossible to discredit a Black person.
there are "clear" and "transparent" - indirect evidence:
in this way, you can frame any undesirable person by appealing to the fact that there is no 100% proof of save file tampering, therefore there is no need for it. But there are suspicions, which means he may be guilty (because he could have done it) - it is difficult to argue with this, but how does the fact that a person has the opportunity to commit a crime imply that he committed it?
as for replacing one player with another, the evidence is even more indirect, but it is difficult to deny their logic, this must be acknowledged.
If a person wins against top players in Tournaments, then his game in the season should not differ very much, although this is also a controversial issue due to the fact that a person may have a different attitude towards tournament and seasonal games.
____
as proof of the substitution, Pit for LM refers, for example, to linguistic analysis of the texts of the reports! And who did this analysis? Pit for LM himself?
In order to accept this argument, I personally need a photograph or the document itself - an official conclusion from a professional linguist, is there such a photograph?
