Kilgor, what's your involvement here? :)
You and Bloody are like state prosecutors (official prosecutors from AK).
There's an ancient Eastern wisdom: "Don't rush to punish someone who deserves punishment, as they will receive their punishment without you, but hurry to reward someone who deserves a reward."
AK can be understood; it's their job, their duty, the king's duty to publicly punish the wrongdoer to prevent such crimes in the future.
But I don't think it's possible to agree with AK 100%.
All the evidence that Pete provided for LM, in my opinion, is circumstantial, which undoubtedly proves, but only the possibility of the actions imputed to the accused. + there are thoughts that AK has other hidden motives for the accusation.
But on the other hand, if you put yourself in AK's shoes, the situation starts to look different.
Brr... as I understand it, you've shared your thoughts :)
Everything is transparent and clear in AK's posts. I hope no one will argue with you that Vigo is not an honest person? (1000 USD). Furthermore: AK has presented a lot of strange things about Vigo, and only a very stubborn person (or someone with a vested interest) will ignore them. You have to understand that there won't be ironclad evidence of maphacking (loser is an exception to the rule, which happens once in 1000 years). Notice that the material on Vigo was being collected for several years, and he wasn't banned, so no one was in a hurry.
Ник в лоби - Kilgory