To Vigo or not to Vigo? That is the question.

Look, I already said that sometimes I don't play alone! If an experienced person was standing behind my back, or two players telling me what to do and how to do it correctly, does that count as them playing? If you think so, then it's clear. I never hid this! And in ICQ, I warned that I'm, like, at Vitalik's place or something like "we're thinking about this together" or something similar.

I see, so in principle, any player who went into the darkness in a treasury and found something sweet can be accused of maphack. (Although in that game, that wasn't the case at all; I ran to Seven's hero by the flag, went in with full confidence, and it turned out he was the GG ))) So the invincible Seven just snapped because of my luck)))
Well whatever, we're just beating a dead horse.
You've stated your position. I disagree with the accusation.
To avoid creating moral clutter and not distracting the AK staff from their duties, I ask that you create a poll in this thread. After all, many players' fates were decided this way—who to ban, who to unban, etc.
Well, based on the results of the questions—whether they consider me a cheater or dishonest, whether to ban me or not, or something similar—you know better how to format the surveys. Then everything will be clear.

What is this circus? Where is it stated, and who said, that a player cannot have any help in the game??? Have you overplayed yourselves? Or underplayed—it doesn't seem like that at all)...
In Vigo's place, I would admit to repeated assistance (in any form—legitimate—without maphack) from friends and demand the presentation of official claims regarding maphack—and in case of failure to provide them—an official apology and punishment of the persons responsible in the specific situation!
P.S. Every streamer gets dozens of tips in their ears—as a lawyer, I see no difference between who can "sing" better—the renowned Vitalik sitting next to Vigo, or a dozen fans... in any case, this is one form of prompting—with the same responsibility... which there isn't and cannot be... what is not forbidden is permitted... come down from the heavens to earth!

B100dy, why don't you take, say, 20 saves from 50 currently active players. Review them all, and estimate the average skill deviation of a specific player, and then across the forum. Because, you see, they look at saves for a couple of people trying to find maphack, but the fact that half the forum might play absolutely the same way doesn't bother anyone.

Wait, are you speaking for yourself now or for all of AK? As I understand it, all the renowned material is with Pit—which is evidenced by your words above:
"The analysis is being done for the forum, as you requested. As soon as Pit posts all the material, everyone will be able to evaluate it (if they have the strength to read and verify everything) and decide for themselves."
In a word—I conclude—specifically you have no facts—we are waiting for Pit and his "dossier"—well, I am just expressing my opinion—the game with Sevensan and Mike in no way looks like maphack—I can express my opinion, can't I?
Then a counter-question—if Vigo was silent for a month—then Pit was silent for so many years, collecting (for what purpose is unclear) facts of assistance during gameplay by third-party players (although this is not forbidden as I understand)—I feel that based on the other facts from the collected collection, we will not reach a consensus—there is no such rule—to play by a template and always lose to a stronger player!