To Vigo or not to Vigo? That is the question.

Then, a counter-question: if Vigo was silent for a month, then Pete was silent for so many years, collecting (it's unclear why) facts about outside players helping during the game (although this is not prohibited, as I understand it) - based on the other facts from the collected data, I don't think we will reach a consensus - there is no such rule - to play according to a template and always lose to a stronger player!

Indeed, why? I myself sometimes don't understand why all this is and who we want to help, if half of the forum doesn't care about it. There are few people anyway, they will somehow figure it out themselves, and I will find something more interesting to do than sitting here and proving something to someone.

It seems that Vigo has really upset some members of the AC.

Not at all! I can't speak for everyone, but I personally don't have many complaints about Vigo as a player. He just plays, and let him play, I don't think I've ever refused to play with him, and I played a tournament with Loser, I remember. This is not so important in general - it's just a fun game for pleasure, to play. This would also apply to tournaments if he played in them himself, but it didn't work out. :smile32: You can convince yourself of anything, ignore anything, but I have drawn my own conclusions, and they are 100% not in Vigo's favor.
And the people seem to be good, Vigo, Vitalik, well, judging by how they communicate. I have a separate story with Vitalik. He was the first player I played with when I joined online. I sent a game request, he replied, helped me with the hotkeys, sent me a map, and something else, in general, we played, and of course, I lost badly, but I had the best impression of him, and I was very upset to read how he was being harassed in the MapHack on HP, I even wrote a post in his support at the time. But time passes, we grow up, we realize something, we gain new information, and only the most stubborn and short-sighted people will always insist and stand their ground when everything says that they are wrong.

Why are we here? To determine whether Vigo was placed on the blacklist fairly or unfairly. And players are placed on the blacklist only to warn others about a possible trick on their part and so that the organizers have grounds not to include them in the tournament. Why include a person in a tournament if players refuse to play with him? If he can't even find a worthy opponent in the season?

In general, let's have a vote, let people express their opinion. If everyone doesn't care and they are ready to play with Vigo, Vitalik, Loser, etc. - no problem, play. I will delete the Blacklist on the same day and leave the AC, because there will be no point in staying there anymore.