RiMpel2, I think I understand why the AC needs to deliberate and make its decisions in closed session. There is a complete, absolute picture based on which a decision is made. And then it begins: one person thinks he must defend some so-called honor of the clan and spout any nonsense, including about the presumption of innocence, unwilling to open his eyes to the truth — that their comrade is rotten. Another, out of friendly motives, starts adding his own two cents. Then a couple of people show up who write in general terms regarding the overall mass of players. Someone considers it his duty to pick out some fact from the list, cast doubt on it, or bring up conditions in which its application is generally incorrect. And so on.
Have you already defined your role? :rolleyes:
