To Vigo or not to Vigo? That is the question.

Hold on, are you speaking for yourself or for the entire team? As I understand it, all the controversial material is with Pete, as evidenced by your words above: "The analysis is being done for the forum, as you requested. As soon as Pete posts all the material, everyone will be able to evaluate it (if they have the strength to read and verify everything) and decide for themselves." In short, I conclude that you don't have any concrete facts – we're waiting for Pete and his "dossier." And I'm just expressing my opinion – the game with Sevanson and Mike doesn't seem like map hacking to me. I can express my opinion, can't I? So, a counter-question: if Vigo was silent for a month, then Pete has been silent for years, collecting (for some unclear reason) facts about assistance during the game from outside players (although this is not prohibited, as I understand it). Based on the other facts from the collected material, I don't think we'll reach a consensus – there's no rule that says you have to play according to a template and always lose to a stronger player!