To Vigo or not to Vigo? That is the question.

numOne, I'm not defending anyone – believe me – I really don't see any facts. You've piled up all the accusations, but I don't see any logic or consistency in them...
1) "falsification of tournament results" – please provide a link to the rules that state that a player must independently make decisions in the game, and if this rule is violated, they are obliged to report it and admit their defeat.
2) several accounts from one computer – maybe the Vigo club created this – let's say, a gathering of Heroes players – you can't blame them for this; you should praise and encourage them in every way, with the wording: "for promoting the game and maintaining interest in our old mother!"
3) accusation of maphacking – this is much more serious, but I don't see any facts. He went somewhere in the dark, jumped out onto a "chocolate" spot – this is all well-known... moreover, Jebus – if I saw the opponent moving around, I wouldn't engage (if I wasn't ready), but I would take a risk and make a move that many here wouldn't understand – something like a throw in that direction – and considering Jebus's build, there's a high probability that this move will bring something that is well-rewarded... or the case described with Mike in the money tournament – that is, if Vigo hadn't been playing, he would have won, but since Vigo was playing, he couldn't win, because his level of play couldn't achieve victory there)). This depends on what and with whom you compare, but you can't reason like that, no matter how unpleasant it is to lose...
In short, it's sad to read all this – there are no facts, I don't see links to the rules, poor Gomunguls can't break into the topic from lunch (Numwan is cleaning up))... I suggest somehow getting out of this unpleasant situation – the members of the AC should present official facts of maphacking (and not stories about a white bull), and if there are none, they should apologize to the player and think about what was done wrong and how to prevent it in the future – but let's not go too deep; we need to deal with this first!