To Vigo or not to Vigo? That is the question.

"stirred up a hornet's nest; obviously, the so-called 'wasps' are not blameless and mutual responsibility is developed 100%. IP coincidence, e-mail, facts of personal acquaintance and joint games, statistics and game results, facts of cheating with multiple accounts. In general, it's all clear to me here. Losers, Vigos, Quertys, and the like, they're all birds of a feather."
Isn't this a biased opinion???!!! A "third party" came in to express their unbiased opinion....

Absolutely unbiased, but formed as a result of information received with references to numerous direct and indirect pieces of evidence, for I can read, and so far I'm only reading what paints you in a less-than-flattering light. I would gladly hear your side and might even change my opinion, but the trouble is, apart from "I'm not guilty," you haven't provided any counterarguments yet, even though the thread was created by you precisely for this purpose. Therefore, I ask you to refrain from mockery; as for my allegorical manner of expression, there is nothing offensive in it:
1) "Stir up a hornet's nest" – a colloquial expression: to touch upon a delicate subject...;
2) "Not blameless" – it turns out that he who is, even if implicitly, possibly involved in a bad deed;
3) "Birds of a feather" – people close in common interests and spatial proximity; mutual responsibility applies here as well.
Well, as for my opinion, I believe anyone has the right to express it, just as anyone has the right to defend theirs.