To Vigo or not to Vigo? That is the question.

I don't see any transparency in the decision-making process on the forum – please provide a link to where the powers of the AK are specified... Simply put, if there is a specific list of rights, there should also be a list of certain obligations – I’m not talking about organizational issues; I mean many other things...

Please:
/topic/at/264008/

What kind of transparency do you want in the decision-making process? In matters concerning bans and map hacks, the AK can only rely on its purely subjective opinion, based on experience, so to speak. Any accusation in Heroes 3 online can be refuted (unless it was blatant cheating that is easy to track), this has been proven more than once, but when enough of these suspicions accumulate, they can all be combined into a certain picture, quite understandable for any more or less experienced player. All materials available on Vigo will be provided upon his request, which came only now; apparently, everything was fine before.

And generally, for your information, anyone who wants to declare the actions of the AK as illegitimate has the right to create a corresponding topic and hold a vote. If the forum votes to dissolve the AK, we will resign with peace of mind. Believe me, constantly digging into all of this is not the most pleasant activity, and it won't bring you any honor. The AK was created solely to make the forum cleaner, to help newcomers, and to weed out unreliable players, thereby giving the organizers grounds to deny them access to tournaments. That’s all. There is no universal conspiracy here.