To Vigo or not to Vigo? That is the question.

1) It's hard to assess the level of play – it seems to be the first thing that comes to mind – "how good am I?", and if you haven't thought about that... it's very strange. Besides, you have such a wide range of opponents – it's easy to find your level... 2) Again, you play a lot, but even if there aren't players at your level, you could say, for example, "Well, I don't know, but I'm better than 7z and Noobhim, but weaker than Ikhtiandr or Tvarina," and that would be an answer. Conclusion... All the answers seem more like evasions and are in the same vein... 3) Regarding proof – it seems to me that the AK (Anti-Cheat) team has nothing better to do, and they're thinking, "Should we ban someone for cheating?" (Sarcasm) There are strong and intelligent players there who can assess the game, the approximate style, and so on – and compare games and draw the appropriate conclusion...