To Vigo or not to Vigo? That is the question.

So, what difference does it make who helped him or is helping him – I don’t understand. I read that there was an accusation of maphacking – that’s a completely different matter. Does anyone have any concrete evidence? Because without it, you can’t ban or accuse someone of something you can’t even understand…
I don’t see transparency in the decision-making process on the forum. Please give me a link where the powers of the Arbitration Committee (AK) are specified. Simply put, if there is a specific list of rights, there should also be a list of some responsibilities. I’m not talking about organizational issues; I’m talking about many other things…