Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
3. There is no difference between the so-called "blitz game" and, for example, an unlimited time game. Let me explain: I'm not saying anything about chess with Seventsan, but in chess, blitz games and regular games have different styles. Blitz is more conducive to active actions, sacrificing pieces, which is not always a good development in classical chess. Here, I don't see a fundamental difference between a game with 4 minutes and an unlimited time game. Perhaps in an unlimited time game, the player will have 5-10% more time and that's it. Priorities, the strength of Castles - there is no difference. In comparison, when playing blitz on the WT version (timer 600+300), the content of the game changes significantly.
in the 1st week, 4 minutes is usually enough, but in the 2nd, 3rd... when there are already many heroes, many often don't have enough time, and this is far from your mythical 5-10%, but much more! sometimes even 5 seconds may not be enough, and this will cost the game (didn't place units, didn't buy items, didn't build a Castle in the end...) there were many such cases in 5 Tournaments
RomarioGrom
