Skip to content

Ethnological Research

User Avatar
#19
Auto-translated
SKIF;62639
Horror? What kind? For example, during the Ossetian-Georgian "conflict" (the genocide of Ossetians by Georgia), Georgians buried more than 15 young men alive in the middle of the village, in front of their parents. The wounded son of a friend of my father was taken prisoner by Georgians, tortured with a soldering iron, and then they put his head in a vise and squeezed it so hard that his eyes popped out. It was the Georgians who raided and massacred Ossetian villages at night, and they beat infants against the walls. Is that enough, or should I continue?
It was the Ingush who attacked the Ossetians, not the other way around. Almost all the militants who captured the infamous school in Beslan were Ingush.
So, how is it? Enough horror???
As you can see, you yourself judge people based on their nationality.
Regarding the horrors you described, I will say this: killers and beasts have no nationality. Should we now declare all Germans as villains and scoundrels because of World War II? People don't confuse the concepts of "fascist" and "German," but you are confusing the concepts of "bandit" and "Ingush."
SKIF;62639
Ossetians belong to the Indo-Iranian ethnic group, Georgians are Semites, and the Ingush, as a nation, have existed for no more than three centuries.
I wasn't asking about the ethnic differences between the Caucasian peoples. I was saying that I absolutely don't care how many centuries a nation has existed, especially when a man with obvious Caucasian features and a corresponding accent rudely harasses me on the street.
By the way, "a person of Caucasian nationality" is an idiom, and it is not usually taken literally. We all know that there is no such nationality as "Caucasian"; we went to school.