Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
It's strange how much time has passed, how many events have occurred, yet Stalin and Nicholas II remain the most discussed figures. And the most discussed topics are the revolution and the repressions. Few delve deeply into the past, and even fewer are satisfied with the present.
Here's another paradox: the 20th century is the closest to us, yet we know less truth about it than we do about primitive people.
And in general, textbooks should be written with space for adjustments, so that with each change in the "general line," one could simply pencil in the necessary names and epithets. Something like this: "Thanks to the heroic/significant/unnecessary efforts of Lenin/Stalin/Putin, the most just/dishonest/cruel society in the world was built (underline the appropriate one)."