Zybr
Auto-translated
In my opinion, freedom of speech (expression) is more important than a subjective punitive measure. Moderating posts (including offensive ones) is better than restricting opinions through an imaginary threat.
Rules exist to combat inappropriate behavior, not normal people.
For example, if you remove the rule about off-topic posts, then delete someone's post, and the author complains about you and points to the rules. And he doesn't care about all your talk about morality.
The same applies to the abolition of the ban on profanity. Such a ban should definitely not be abolished.
I received a huge number of points in 2009, and I can easily be banned permanently for receiving just one point for the same off-topic behavior after three or even four years.
This only encourages people to create clones and many other similar actions. If a person remains interested in the forum, that's actually a good thing.
But registering clones definitely cannot give a positive assessment to a user.
If necessary, it is enough to block the account for a certain period, that's all.
Well, in my opinion, there's a different problem here, namely, outdated points. It was discussed somehow, but it hasn't led to anything yet.
Hmm, points still become outdated; Reven has 162.5, no matter how you look at it, and that's much more than 100.
I sincerely and wholeheartedly sympathize with the moderation team of the third section, who lost such a saintly person.
Personally, I wouldn't be on the forum if it were, let's say, free for speech, because everyone interprets it in their own way, and I wouldn't want to see tactless and offensive (in any form) communication.
Барон "Vampires"
Отдай свои прошлые сны,
В сомненьях себя обрети,
В бешеном танце душа кружится!
Не думай, что будет потом,
Здесь и сейчас мы живем,
Стань хоть на миг сам собой, слышишь!