Skip to content
#10
Auto-translated
4.1. - (For having more than 15% and less than 30% of irrelevant content in a message)
4.2. - (For having more than 15% and less than 30% of off-topic content in a message)
4.3. - (For having more than 30% of irrelevant content in a message)
4.4. - (For having more than 30% of off-topic content in a message)
4.5. - (For creating a duplicate topic on the forum)
I would remove these points.
4.6. - (For a message containing flame)
4.7. - (For a message containing trolling)
4.9. - (For any direct or indirect insults of users, third parties, or organizations)
4.22. - (For publicly discussing the actions of moderators, coordinators, or administrators)
I would leave these.
4.15. - (For addressing other users using nicknames different from their original ones, in case the user does not like this type of address)
I agree with Ment here: insults will violate point 4.9, and anything else is unlikely to be offensive.
4.23. - (For a false appeal)
Leave it.
4.24. - (For violating the appeal format (any extra messages in the appeal topic that contradict its format as described in the rules))
But I would remove this as well. I think that the more people express their opinion, the fairer the decision will be.

Initially, Dubrovin Pavel also suggested removing this point:
For using vulgar and offensive language in your nicknames, avatars, messages, and signatures, 10 violation points
I think it is possible to remove the ban on using profanity in messages. That is, as with irrelevant and off-topic content, such content will be removed, but points will not be issued. Then the system will be closer to the current situation on the forum.

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: Фёдор Фёдорович