Skip to content

Social poll.

User Avatar
#165
Auto-translated
Vaflya
That's just nonsense!
Barya was creating a mod for the players, not for hardcore players, and think about the assumptions in the rules that you have, which make it impossible to manage things properly without the HDmod. Make the timeframes wider, and then there won't be any advantage for hardcore players. You're really getting on my nerves; can't you see the difference: gameplay and interface! These are two completely different things!
Version 2.98 is enough for the average player. Those who just want to play for fun shouldn't even be interested in the gameplay, so their opinion can be disregarded. This "average player" doesn't care about replaying the campaign.
Vaflya

Now, let's look at the scale of mod usage. Out of 100 games, there will be one instance like this. Multiply that by the number of players with HDmod + campaign compatibility for everyone, divide by two (because two players are playing), and let's say that one person plays half a game every day. That means there are at least 150-200 cases every day, and all these cases remain unnoticed, and everyone just keeps quiet. In my opinion, this RC5 version, which was released by chance, is outdated and deserves to be investigated and announced.
That's nonsense coming from you, and it's a serious exaggeration. One instance of using a bug out of 100 to maintain a minimal army is NOTHING compared to the time we'll save in 100 games. Can you calculate how many HOURS will be saved in 100 games?

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: dylanyamaha