Social poll.

Kilgor, As I understand it, there are no absolute opponents to quick play here. There are only opponents to its one-sided implementation. And the main argument on this point is simple and clear: if one player uses quick play, and the other doesn't, then the first player has an obvious advantage. I also don't understand the fervent persistence of those fighting for one-sided quick play. If the idea of replayable quick play appealed to virtually the entire majority, then everyone will happily install the mod, giving themselves and their opponent the opportunity to use it. What, then, is the point of making it one-sided? To force the whole world to play with the HD mod? It seems to me that this contradicts the very idea of the HD mod. Imagine an abstract situation: a world championship is taking place. A player from, say, Albania, who doesn't even know about the existence of the mod and replayable quick play, is playing against a HW player. And our player, without the opponent's knowledge, will use quick play. Is that fair?