Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
How tired I am of explaining things to people who just don't get it... Seriously, why do you write these self-important memos without even reading a couple of forum posts?
My opinion, and I think the opinion of many who approach the matter with a clear head, is that Quick Capture should be replayable, bug-free, and two-sided, and nothing else! This is a definite advantage over the opponent.
What specific advantage is there? (if you make Quick Capture bug-free)
Accelerating time is indeed a useful thing, but it has already been stated many times why Quick Capture on one side is cheating.
Arguments? Just don't bring up the same old ones; they've been thoroughly debunked here.
And yes, I've read all this unrestrained nonsense and am sometimes amazed at how different people can be.
I hope so. Your answers will show us whether you actually read it or not.
Kilgor
