Social poll.

I think many people here are writing, but not reading. Almost no one objected to the re-playable quick battles in SoD. The objections were about including it unilaterally, because it can give a real advantage – some battles are fought in quick battles with such small losses that a human player cannot repeat (archers, for example, have a low chance of morale, but it exists). Would you play chess, for example, if your opponent had a 1% chance of resurrecting (or surviving after a battle) a pawn? The probability is low, it may not happen, but it exists.

I may be wrong here, as I haven't played with the re-playable quick battles, but a human player can repeat quick battles won without losses in about 10 seconds (flew in - killed, just like in an auto-battle). How many such battles are there per turn in SoD, starting from the 2nd week? Let's say there are 6 per turn on average – that saves a minute. Over three weeks, that's 21 minutes. Please don't compare this to the number of battles in HotA, the pace and timing are different. More time will be saved here if turns are passed faster, rather than moving back and forth on the map when the heroes have no mana left and there is nothing to build in the castles (and this takes hours of Fisher time).

2 Kilgor, in the future, I will always be happy to play with you with the bug-free, re-playable quick battles enabled, even if it is disabled on your end.

you are talking about some hypothetical time saving in quick combat

There should be a culture of playing first and mutual respect, and if the latter is not present, people will often deliberately waste time, in retaliation for the opponent's long turns or simply to get on their nerves.