Do you agree to leave it as is?

See player2 and player6 as examples – do you agree to leave this flaw in your system?

Added 2 minutes later
What do you mean? In both cases, it's 100 points.

Yes, I've already corrected that message. In both cases, it's 100 if we're only talking about the leader. Go look at my latest example and calculate the points for everyone else; the mere fact of taking second place will give a significant bonus from your component, and so on. According to your system with the oscillator, the second component significantly affects the overall rating compared to the first component, and there may be situations where a less skilled player has a higher rating. See the example.

Isn't that an exaggeration?

And aren't the attacks about common sense the same thing?