Let's organize a tournament.

What's wrong? Is there nothing wrong with the participation restriction in some of the 3s tournaments on this resource?
By the way, me and Alex talked and reworked the formula - this evening we'll make a separate post with an announcement for discussion and registration.

I assume that the number of people playing 3s is much larger than those playing 5s. We have about 20 active players here, and if the tournament requires 16 participants, by what principle will those who are "not worthy to participate" be determined (the portal rating for HeroesWorld is not an indicator, and generally ratings cannot be indicators for tournament participation), and most importantly, why should there be any such people at all? In any case, I'll wait for the topic to appear, and then we'll see and read; who knows, maybe the reworked formula will suit absolutely everyone.

----Added at 20:06----

Overall, I like the idea of a tournament, an analogue of the favorites in 3s.

The situation in 3s is somewhat different. I am in favor of tournaments, but against tournaments with a limited number of participants that leave out those who wish to play in them but "aren't good enough." We barely have a little over 20 actives, and with such arrangements, no more will appear.