Mafia: general discussions.

The ban on revealing roles implies that revealing roles is prohibited. How can this be interpreted in two ways? Regardless of the side, if a player is prohibited from revealing a role, they shouldn't do it. Anyone. Because it's information either way.
A Town member, a "Khokhol," for example (described below), is revealed by another (strong) role in order to cover it up. Where is the non-revelation here? And it's beneficial.

The rules shouldn't be flexible. It creates double standards. They can't be tailored to different sides, to all sorts of players. And with anyone, even the most bland, there is room for perversions, maneuvers, etc., and the human factor must be taken into account.

A feint is not the same as a reveal. Psychologically, any player who has information, even a little, gives themselves away. In their reasoning, actions, attempts at analysis. One side does this naturally, the other artificially.

Khokhol - a town role. If he is killed, the killer dies along with him.