Mafia: general discussions.

This works in psychomafia, but in ulitkomafia, you can't blatantly pretend to be someone else.

Does the moderator forbid it? If the newspaper doesn't clearly show that the mafia player is obviously pretending to be a certain role, and it's also not clear whether that role is definitively claimed by someone else, then it's allowed.

I don't know where this came from, but it should be punished in both directions, regardless of whether it's a false reveal or a real reveal.

A real reveal is already punished with a modkill. A false reveal isn't punished, but it's exposed by the absence of a modkill. Punishing both sides for a reveal is absurd; it's like forbidding the mafia from lying when their survival often depends on it. Punishing only the town for a reveal is stupid for the reason mentioned above, but it's better than nothing. However, in our games, only Tox reveals, while the others play fairly. In my opinion, such ill-conceived punishments are unnecessary, especially since there's a huge difference between a reveal and pretending to be someone. What's next? In the December game with Vistrita, for example, Hostor pretended to be a double-voice, with the help of his team and the misguided town players. A modkill of the team that supposedly revealed a mafia player as a town player during the day to gain an advantage? If someone is so bothered by reveals (of a single player, haha), then you can punish them with external methods: sanctions or exclusion from the next n games, but not with modkill-warnings that ruin the current game.