Skip to content

Round table

#3128
Auto-translated
I wrote this in the forum, but judging by the number of views, only Vik and Oelm are active there now. So, I'm reposting it here:
The Arbitration Committee (AK) has reviewed all available information regarding the submitted game saves featuring Chemist_HP, and in particular, the match against Javdet in the FB-6 tournament, and has reached the following decision:
There was no maphacking in the games, and there is no basis for awarding the match to Javdet. Therefore, Chemist_HP continues to participate in the FB-6 tournament in the upper bracket (from the moment of his victory over Javdet).

With this, the topic is considered closed. For any questions, please contact icq 305035002 (numOne), or other members of the AK.
Javdet, by publicly accusing Chemist, caused significant damage to Chemist's reputation, not to mention that an innocent person was forced to defend himself against a large number of questions. Although Javdet could have done this in a private thread or only with the members of the AK, he chose to make the accusations public. In addition, he was caught attempting to falsify evidence.
So, let's start. The second game against Javdet. Castle - Swamp.

In screenshot 121 of the comic, the trajectory of Val's movement is correct.
In photo 122, it is completely incorrect. From the lighting in screenshot 123, it is clear that Val did not visit the garden.
Do you think it is normal for a player to accuse another of cheating, to deceive with evidence, and then not be held accountable?