Skip to content
User Avatar
#3072
Auto-translated
Oelm
If we try to generalize, it's definitely about a consumer society. For me personally, the synonym for a fool is a coward. A person incapable of action and self-improvement. A vegetable. A person who is not responsible for what he says, afraid of responsibility in general, and therefore invents "authorities" so that in case of failure, he can refer to them.
This is a rather strange interpretation – why not use the word "coward" then? After all, the word "fool," in all its interpretations, is related to a person's intellectual abilities.
Not quite. Anarchy is usually a temporary phenomenon, and society will eventually self-organize into some kind of order. At the same time, anarchy, like a surgical scalpel, can be quite useful for a country and society.
Everything has its positive sides. It's just that anarchy has relatively few of them compared to other options. It's an extreme option, used when others don't help.

There is also the opinion that most of those who advocate for anarchy will end up at the very bottom of the food chain when real anarchy arrives.