Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Secondly, a fool doesn't know how to argue. In an argument, they are only interested in dominance; their only argument is personal attacks, and they define the opponent's point of view only by inherent, innate characteristics: they live abroad (or in the Russian provinces), they are Jewish (or Cossack), they raise children (or a cat). The fact that one can be Jewish, live in the provinces, and raise children, or be a Cossack living abroad and raising a cat, simply doesn't fit into the fool's mind. They think in patterns.
The article could have been commissioned if it were aimed at a wide audience; otherwise, the purpose of the commission is lost.
If you're interested in arguing in a way that makes you seem reasonable, please don't write about Silberbilbergroods and other Frankensteins.
Or maybe the point isn't about the Renaissance at all, and the fool has such a powerful compensatory mechanism that we can't even imagine? Perhaps it's an irrational intuition, amazing physical perfection, or the ability to hinder progress? After all, Leonov predicted in "The Pyramid" that humanity is doomed to degradation; otherwise, it will destroy itself and the world.
Oelm
