Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
This topic has been raised more than once or twice.
We need to make a fundamental decision: whether to allow loads or not.
If not, then all misunderstandings, ambiguities, and grievances should be left to the discretion of the players.
If we do allow them, then I think we should do it like this:
Option 1: 1 or 2 loads on the group stage, 1 load on the playoff stage for each game. If a load is not used, it "expires."
Option 2: If a load is given to player A, they must give their opponent (player B) the opportunity to load as well. In this case, if player A requests a second consecutive load, and player B has not yet used their load opportunity, then:
either player A is awarded a loss;
or, in the event of player A winning, the game is declared a draw.
In both options, the judges must be informed about the loads.